Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 57
Filtrar
2.
Neurología (Barc., Ed. impr.) ; 36(4): 253-261, mayo 2021. tab
Artigo em Espanhol | IBECS | ID: ibc-219742

RESUMO

Introducción y objetivos: Se presenta nuestra experiencia en neuritis óptica (ON) y se elabora un protocolo diagnóstico-terapéutico, que contempla descartar otras causas, principalmente infecciosas y se elabora una hoja informativa para padres.Material y métodoEstudio descriptivo retrospectivo de los pacientes con ON en 27 años (1990-2017). Revisión de evidencia científica para elaboración del protocolo y hoja informativa.ResultadosEn nuestra sección de neuropediatría se valoraron 20.744 niños en 27 años, 14 con ON: 8 ON aisladas, una esclerosis múltiple (EM), un episodio clínicamente aislado (CIS), 3 encefalomielitis agudas diseminadas y un paciente con ON aislada que el año anterior había sufrido una encefalomielitis aguda diseminada. Edades entre 4-13 años, 50% varones. Mayores de 10 años, 8 pacientes: 7 ON aisladas y un EM. Bilaterales 9, retrobulbares 3. Resonancia magnética cerebral normal en 7, solo afectación del nervio óptico en 2 y con desmielinización del SNC en 5 casos. Recibieron corticoterapia 13/14. Un caso vacunado de meningococo-C el mes anterior. Todos evolucionaron favorablemente, salvo la EM. Se presentan el protocolo y la hoja de información.ConclusionesHabitual curso favorable. En niños a partir de 10 años, con factores de riesgo de desarrollar EM o neuromielitis óptica (presencia de hiperseñales en RM cerebral, bandas oligoclonales, anti-NMO, recurrencia de ON), se consensúa con Neurología el inicio de tratamiento inmunomodulador. Utilidad del protocolo para la toma de decisiones diagnósticas, de seguimiento y tratamiento, de una patología poco frecuente pero con posibles repercusiones importantes. Importancia de la protocolización y hojas informativas. (AU)


Introduction and objective: In this article, we present our experience on optic neuritis (ON) and provide a diagnostic/therapeutic protocol, intended to rule out other aetiologies (particularly infection), and a fact sheet for parents.Material and methodsWe conducted a descriptive, retrospective study of patients with ON over a 27-year period (1990-2017). A review of the available scientific evidence was performed in order to draft the protocol and fact sheet.ResultsOur neuropaediatrics department has assessed 20,744 patients in the last 27 years, of whom 14 were diagnosed with ON: 8 had isolated ON, 1 had multiple sclerosis (MS), 1 had clinically isolated syndrome (CIS), 3 had acute disseminated encephalomyelitis, and 1 had isolated ON and a history of acute disseminated encephalomyelitis one year previously. Patients’ age range was 4-13 years; 50% were boys. Eight patients were aged over 10: 7 had isolated ON and 1 had MS. Nine patients had bilateral ON, and 3 had retrobulbar ON. MRI results were normal in 7 patients and showed involvement of the optic nerve only in 2 patients and optic nerve involvement + central nervous system demyelination in 5. Thirteen patients received corticosteroids. One patient had been vaccinated against meningococcus-C the previous month. Progression was favourable, except in the patient with MS. A management protocol and fact sheet are provided.ConclusionsON usually has a favourable clinical course. In children aged older than 10 years with risk factors for MS or optic neuromyelitis (hyperintensity on brain MRI, oligoclonal bands, anti-NMO antibody positivity, ON recurrence), the initiation of immunomodulatory treatment should be agreed with the neurology department. The protocol is useful for diagnostic decision-making, follow-up, and treatment of this rare disease with potentially major repercussions. The use of protocols and fact sheets is important. (AU)


Assuntos
Humanos , Encefalomielite Aguda Disseminada , Esclerose Múltipla , Neuromielite Óptica , Neurite Óptica/diagnóstico , Neurite Óptica/terapia , Estudos Retrospectivos
3.
Neurologia (Engl Ed) ; 36(4): 253-261, 2021 May.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29526320

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: In this article, we present our experience on optic neuritis (ON) and provide a diagnostic/therapeutic protocol, intended to rule out other aetiologies (particularly infection), and a fact sheet for parents. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a descriptive, retrospective study of patients with ON over a 27-year period (1990-2017). A review of the available scientific evidence was performed in order to draft the protocol and fact sheet. RESULTS: Our neuropaediatrics department has assessed 20,744 patients in the last 27 years, of whom 14 were diagnosed with ON: 8 had isolated ON, 1 had multiple sclerosis (MS), 1 had clinically isolated syndrome (CIS), 3 had acute disseminated encephalomyelitis, and 1 had isolated ON and a history of acute disseminated encephalomyelitis one year previously. Patients' age range was 4-13 years; 50% were boys. Eight patients were aged over 10: 7 had isolated ON and 1 had MS. Nine patients had bilateral ON, and 3 had retrobulbar ON. MRI results were normal in 7 patients and showed involvement of the optic nerve only in 2 patients and optic nerve involvement + central nervous system demyelination in 5. Thirteen patients received corticosteroids. One patient had been vaccinated against meningococcus-C the previous month. Progression was favourable, except in the patient with MS. A management protocol and fact sheet are provided. CONCLUSIONS: ON usually has a favourable clinical course. In children aged older than 10 years with risk factors for MS or optic neuromyelitis (hyperintensity on brain MRI, oligoclonal bands, anti-NMO antibody positivity, ON recurrence), the initiation of immunomodulatory treatment should be agreed with the neurology department. The protocol is useful for diagnostic decision-making, follow-up, and treatment of this rare disease with potentially major repercussions. The use of protocols and fact sheets is important.


Assuntos
Neurite Óptica , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Encefalomielite Aguda Disseminada , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Esclerose Múltipla , Neuromielite Óptica , Neurite Óptica/diagnóstico , Neurite Óptica/terapia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Literatura de Revisão como Assunto
10.
Neurología (Barc., Ed. impr.) ; 34(5): 291-299, jun. 2019. tab, ilus
Artigo em Espanhol | IBECS | ID: ibc-180845

RESUMO

Introducción: La cerebelitis aguda es una rara afección inflamatoria con curso clínico muy variable: desde proceso autolimitado benigno hasta presentación fulminante con riesgo vital por compresión de fosa posterior, hidrocefalia aguda e hipertensión endocraneal. Métodos: Revisión de los hallazgos clínicos, analíticos y radiológicos de niños diagnosticados de cerebelitis aguda en el periodo comprendido entre mayo del 2007 y noviembre del 2016. Se analizan los tratamientos empleados y la evolución clínica y radiológica. Resultados: Nueve niños cumplían criterios de cerebelitis. La cefalea, los vómitos y la somnolencia fueron los síntomas de presentación más frecuentes; la ataxia, la disartria y la dismetría fueron los signos cerebelosos más frecuentes. La resonancia magnética fue el método diagnóstico mostrando afectación cerebelosa (uni o bilateral), mientras que la tomografía computarizada fue normal o solo mostraba signos indirectos como hidrocefalia triventricular por compresión extrínseca del acueducto de Silvio. Los corticoides fueron el tratamiento más empleado, administrados en 6 de los pacientes. Un paciente requirió intervención quirúrgica por hidrocefalia triventricular. Ocho pacientes tuvieron recuperación completa, mientras que uno presenta déficits neurológicos. Conclusiones: La cerebelitis es una urgencia médico-quirúrgica. Precisa un alto índice de sospecha y la realización de resonancia magnética cerebral urgente. Es un síndrome clínico-radiológico: encefalopatía aguda o subaguda, con hipertensión endocraneal y síndrome cerebeloso junto a hiperintensidad en córtex cerebeloso (uni o bilateral) en secuencias T2 y FLAIR y posible dilatación triventricular. El tratamiento es con corticoides a dosis altas y puede precisar derivación ventricular externa y cirugía descompresiva


Introduction: Acute cerebellitis is a rare inflammatory disease with a highly variable clinical course that ranges from benign self-limiting symptoms to a fulminant presentation associated with a high risk of death due to compression of the posterior fossa, acute hydrocephalus, and intracranial hypertension. Methods: We reviewed clinical, laboratory, and radiological findings from children diagnosed with acute cerebellitis between May 2007 and November 2016. We analysed treatments and clinical and radiological progression. Results: Nine children met the diagnostic criteria for cerebellitis. Headache, vomiting, and drowsiness were the most frequent initial symptoms; ataxia, dysarthria, and dysmetria were the most common cerebellar signs. Cerebellitis was diagnosed with magnetic resonance imaging, which revealed cerebellar involvement (unilateral or bilateral); computerised tomography images either were normal or showed indirect signs such as triventricular hydrocephalus due to extrinsic compression of the aqueduct of Sylvius. Corticosteroids were the most commonly used treatment (6 patients). One patient required surgery due to triventricular hydrocephalus. Eight patients recovered completely, whereas the ninth displayed neurological sequelae. Conclusions: Cerebellitis is a medical and surgical emergency; diagnosis requires a high level of suspicion and an emergency brain magnetic resonance imaging study. It is a clinical-radiological syndrome characterised by acute or subacute encephalopathy with intracranial hypertension and cerebellar syndrome associated with T2-weighted and FLAIR hyperintensities in the cerebellar cortex (unilaterally or bilaterally) and possible triventricular dilatation. Treatment is based on high-dose corticosteroids and may require external ventricular drain placement and decompressive surgery


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Pré-Escolar , Criança , Infecções do Sistema Nervoso Central/diagnóstico , Edema Encefálico/diagnóstico , Hidrocefalia/diagnóstico , Hipertensão Intracraniana/diagnóstico , Infecções do Sistema Nervoso Central/complicações , Cefaleia/etiologia , Ataxia/etiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Corticosteroides/uso terapêutico
11.
Rev Neurol ; 68(1): 7-10, 2019 Jan 01.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30560983

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) have a high predisposition to develop attention-deficit disorder. The aim of this study is to determine the prevalence of NF1 patients with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) diagnosis attending our Child Neurology Department. We assess patient adherence and medical treatment outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Identification of patients with NF1 being followed up from December 31 2015 to June 31 2017 with ADHD diagnosis. Clinical and treatment data were collected. RESULTS: 56 patients with NF1 were enrolled in the study with a mean age of 9.83 ± 4.17 years. 23 patients (41%) were diagnosed with ADHD, mean age at ADHD diagnosis of 7.53 ± 2.46 years. School-age children with ADHD represented 48.8% of cases. All but one of the children received treatment, mean duration of treatment was 3.85 ± 3.04 years. 19 out of 22 patients (86%) continue medical treatment. Positive effects were reported by eleven patients with a moderate response in eight patients. CONCLUSIONS: Prevalence of ADHD in patients with NF1 is high. Early diagnosis and treatment of ADHD in patients with NF1 is highlighted by this study. Our study reveals good patient adherence and medical treatment outcomes in most patients.


TITLE: Neurofibromatosis tipo 1 y trastorno por deficit de atencion. Nuestra experiencia actual.Introduccion. Los pacientes con neurofibromatosis de tipo 1 (NF1) tienen una gran predisposicion a desarrollar deficit de atencion. El objetivo del estudio es determinar los pacientes controlados en nuestra seccion de neuropediatria con NF1 y diagnostico de trastorno por deficit de atencion/hiperactividad (TDAH), valorando la adhesion y respuesta al tratamiento. Pacientes y metodos. Se identifica a los pacientes afectos de NF1 que siguen controlados entre el 31 de diciembre de 2015 y el 31 de junio de 2017, y de ellos, los que presentan diagnostico de TDAH, revisando datos clinicos y de tratamiento. Resultados. Se ha controlado a 56 pacientes afectos de NF1, con una edad media de 9,83 ± 4,17 años. De ellos, 23 (41%) presentan diagnostico clinico de TDAH, con una edad media de 7,53 ± 2,46 años en el momento del diagnostico. El 48,8% de los niños en edad escolar esta afecto de TDAH. Todos los pacientes menos uno recibieron tratamiento con estimulantes, con un tiempo medio de tratamiento de 3,85 ± 3,04 años. Continuan con el tratamiento 19 pacientes de los 22 tratados (86%). Once casos refieren una clara mejoria, y ocho, una mejoria moderada. Conclusiones. El TDAH es muy prevalente en niños con NF1. Se destaca la importancia de la identificacion y el tratamiento del TDAH en niños afectos de NF1. Nuestra revision muestra una buena adhesion al tratamiento con estimulantes, con mantenida buena respuesta en la mayor parte de los casos.


Assuntos
Transtorno do Deficit de Atenção com Hiperatividade , Neurofibromatose 1 , Transtorno do Deficit de Atenção com Hiperatividade/epidemiologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Humanos , Neurofibromatose 1/epidemiologia , Prevalência , Comportamento Social
12.
Neurologia (Engl Ed) ; 34(5): 291-299, 2019 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28318729

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Acute cerebellitis is a rare inflammatory disease with a highly variable clinical course that ranges from benign self-limiting symptoms to a fulminant presentation associated with a high risk of death due to compression of the posterior fossa, acute hydrocephalus, and intracranial hypertension. METHODS: We reviewed clinical, laboratory, and radiological findings from children diagnosed with acute cerebellitis between May 2007 and November 2016. We analysed treatments and clinical and radiological progression. RESULTS: Nine children met the diagnostic criteria for cerebellitis. Headache, vomiting, and drowsiness were the most frequent initial symptoms; ataxia, dysarthria, and dysmetria were the most common cerebellar signs. Cerebellitis was diagnosed with magnetic resonance imaging, which revealed cerebellar involvement (unilateral or bilateral); computerised tomography images either were normal or showed indirect signs such as triventricular hydrocephalus due to extrinsic compression of the aqueduct of Sylvius. Corticosteroids were the most commonly used treatment (6 patients). One patient required surgery due to triventricular hydrocephalus. Eight patients recovered completely, whereas the ninth displayed neurological sequelae. CONCLUSIONS: Cerebellitis is a medical and surgical emergency; diagnosis requires a high level of suspicion and an emergency brain magnetic resonance imaging study. It is a clinical-radiological syndrome characterised by acute or subacute encephalopathy with intracranial hypertension and cerebellar syndrome associated with T2-weighted and FLAIR hyperintensities in the cerebellar cortex (unilaterally or bilaterally) and possible triventricular dilatation. Treatment is based on high-dose corticosteroids and may require external ventricular drain placement and decompressive surgery.


Assuntos
Doenças Cerebelares/complicações , Doenças Cerebelares/patologia , Cerebelo/patologia , Corticosteroides/uso terapêutico , Ataxia , Ataxia Cerebelar , Doenças Cerebelares/diagnóstico por imagem , Doenças Cerebelares/terapia , Cerebelo/diagnóstico por imagem , Ventrículos Cerebrais/diagnóstico por imagem , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Encefalite , Feminino , Humanos , Hidrocefalia , Inflamação , Hipertensão Intracraniana , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Masculino , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X
13.
Neurología (Barc., Ed. impr.) ; 32(7): 455-462, sept. 2017. tab
Artigo em Espanhol | IBECS | ID: ibc-166250

RESUMO

Objetivo: Estudio descriptivo de epilepsias sintomáticas, según edad de inicio, controladas en una Unidad de Neuropediatría de referencia regional durante 3 años. Pacientes y métodos: Niños con diagnóstico de epilepsia sintomática, controlados del 1 de enero del 2008 hasta el 31 de diciembre del 2010. Resultados: De 4595 niños en el periodo de estudio, recibieron el diagnóstico de epilepsia 605 (13,17%), siendo 277 (45,79%) epilepsias sintomáticas. Entre los pacientes que iniciaron la epilepsia por debajo del año de vida predominan las de etiología sintomática (67,72%). Entre los que la iniciaron entre 1-3 años, fueron sintomáticas el 61,39%. En cuanto a su etiología, ha sido: encefalopatías prenatales (24,46% del total de epilepsias), encefalopatías perinatales (9,26%), encefalopatías posnatales (3,14%), encefalopatías metabólicas y degenerativas (1,98%), esclerosis mesial temporal (1,32%), síndromes neurocutáneos (2,64%), malformaciones vasculares (0,17%), cavernomas (0,17%) y tumores intracraneales (2,48%). Algunas etiologías inician sus manifestaciones epilépticas por debajo del año de vida, como el síndrome de Down, la lisencefalia genética, la infección congénita por citomegalovirus, la encefalopatía hipóxico-isquémica, las encefalopatías metabólicas o la esclerosis tuberosa. Conclusiones: La ausencia de una clasificación universalmente aceptada de los síndromes epilépticos dificulta comparaciones entre series. Sugerimos que todas las epilepsias son sintomáticas puesto que tienen causa, genética o adquirida. La edad de inicio orienta a determinadas etiologías. Una clasificación útil es la etiológica, con 2 grupos: un gran grupo con las etiologías establecidas o síndromes genéticos muy probables y otro de casos sin causa establecida, que con los avances en neuroimagen y genética cada vez será menor (AU)


Objective: We conducted a descriptive study of symptomatic epilepsy by age at onset in a cohort of patients who were followed up at a neuropaediatric department of a reference hospital over a 3-year period. Patients and methods: We included all children with epilepsy who were followed up from January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2010. Results: Of the 4595 children seen during the study period, 605 (13.17%) were diagnosed with epilepsy; 277 (45.79%) of these had symptomatic epilepsy. Symptomatic epilepsy accounted for 67.72% and 61.39% of all epilepsies starting before one year of age, or between the ages of one and 3, respectively. The aetiologies of symptomatic epilepsy in our sample were: prenatal encephalopathies (24.46% of all epileptic patients), perinatal encephalopathies (9.26%), post-natal encephalopathies (3.14%), metabolic and degenerative encephalopathies (1.98%), mesial temporal sclerosis (1.32%), neurocutaneous syndromes (2.64%), vascular malformations (0.17%), cavernomas (0.17%), and intracranial tumours (2.48%). In some aetiologies, seizures begin before the age of one; these include Down syndrome, genetic lissencephaly, congenital cytomegalovirus infection, hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy, metabolic encephalopathies, and tuberous sclerosis. Conclusions: The lack of a universally accepted classification of epileptic syndromes makes it difficult to compare series from different studies. We suggest that all epilepsies are symptomatic because they have a cause, whether genetic or acquired. The age of onset may point to specific aetiologies. Classifying epilepsy by aetiology might be a useful approach. We could establish 2 groups: a large group including epileptic syndromes with known aetiologies or associated with genetic syndromes which are very likely to cause epilepsy, and another group including epileptic syndromes with no known cause. Thanks to the advances in neuroimaging and genetics, the latter group is expected to become increasingly smaller (AU)


Assuntos
Humanos , Lactente , Epilepsia/etiologia , Encefalopatias/complicações , Idade de Início , Epidemiologia Descritiva , Predisposição Genética para Doença , Lesão Encefálica Crônica/epidemiologia , Encefalopatias Metabólicas/epidemiologia , Meningite/epidemiologia
14.
Rev. esp. pediatr. (Ed. impr.) ; 73(2): 85-90, mar.-abr. 2017. tab, ilus
Artigo em Espanhol | IBECS | ID: ibc-163505

RESUMO

Introducción. En la sección de neuropediatría, se trabaja con hojas de información que pretenden explicar de forma rigurosa los problemas y su seguimiento. La de «la epilepsia en la infancia» se entrega cuando existe sospecha o diagnóstico certero de epilepsia. Método. Se analiza, a través de unas encuestas, el grado de satisfacción y las percepciones de los padres o tutores que recibieron dicha hoja. Resultados. 658 pacientes recibieron la hoja de información desde febrero de 2012 hasta diciembre de 2014. La tasa de respuesta es del 56,8%. El 63,10% de los pacientes que recibieron la hoja de información tenían un diagnóstico definitivo de epilepsia. Un 92,7% está satisfecho de haber recibido la hoja. Solo un 0,3% de los pacientes hubiera preferido no recibir la hoja de información. Conclusiones. La mayoría de padres o tutores de los pacientes con sospecha o diagnóstico de epilepsia se mostraron satisfechos por recibir la hoja de información. La hoja de información de «epilepsia en la infancia» mejora la información y la satisfacción percibida y su evaluación para corregir y mejorar, es necesaria en el proceso de mejora que no tiene punto final (AU)


Introduction. In the Pediatric Neurology service, we work with fact sheets that aim to rigorously explain the problems and their follow—up. The «epilepsy in childhood» fact sheet is given when there is suspicion or accurate diagnosis of epilepsy. Methods. The degree of satisfaction and the perceptions of the parents or guardians who received this sheet were analyzed through surveys. Results. 658 patients received the fact sheet from February 2012 to December 2014. The response rate was 56.8%. 63.10% of the patients who received the information sheet had a definitive diagnosis of epilepsy. 92.7% are satisfied to have received the sheet. Only 0.3% of the patients would have preferred not to receive the fact sheet. Conclusion. The majority of parents or guardians of patients with suspected or diagnosed epilepsy were satisfied by receiving the fact sheet. The «epilepsy in childhood» fact sheet improves information and perceived satisfaction, and its evaluation (to correct and improve it) is necessary in the continua] improvement process (AU)


Assuntos
Humanos , Pré-Escolar , Criança , Formulários como Assunto/normas , Termos de Consentimento/estatística & dados numéricos , Epilepsia/diagnóstico , Epilepsia/terapia , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Satisfação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Prognóstico , Epilepsia/epidemiologia
15.
Neurologia ; 32(7): 455-462, 2017 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27091679

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: We conducted a descriptive study of symptomatic epilepsy by age at onset in a cohort of patients who were followed up at a neuropaediatric department of a reference hospital over a 3-year period PATIENTS AND METHODS: We included all children with epilepsy who were followed up from January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2010 RESULTS: Of the 4595 children seen during the study period, 605 (13.17%) were diagnosed with epilepsy; 277 (45.79%) of these had symptomatic epilepsy. Symptomatic epilepsy accounted for 67.72% and 61.39% of all epilepsies starting before one year of age, or between the ages of one and 3, respectively. The aetiologies of symptomatic epilepsy in our sample were: prenatal encephalopathies (24.46% of all epileptic patients), perinatal encephalopathies (9.26%), post-natal encephalopathies (3.14%), metabolic and degenerative encephalopathies (1.98%), mesial temporal sclerosis (1.32%), neurocutaneous syndromes (2.64%), vascular malformations (0.17%), cavernomas (0.17%), and intracranial tumours (2.48%). In some aetiologies, seizures begin before the age of one; these include Down syndrome, genetic lissencephaly, congenital cytomegalovirus infection, hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy, metabolic encephalopathies, and tuberous sclerosis. CONCLUSIONS: The lack of a universally accepted classification of epileptic syndromes makes it difficult to compare series from different studies. We suggest that all epilepsies are symptomatic because they have a cause, whether genetic or acquired. The age of onset may point to specific aetiologies. Classifying epilepsy by aetiology might be a useful approach. We could establish 2 groups: a large group including epileptic syndromes with known aetiologies or associated with genetic syndromes which are very likely to cause epilepsy, and another group including epileptic syndromes with no known cause. Thanks to the advances in neuroimaging and genetics, the latter group is expected to become increasingly smaller.


Assuntos
Idade de Início , Epilepsia/classificação , Epilepsia/etiologia , Neurologia , Pediatria , Encefalopatias/classificação , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Epilepsia/genética , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos
16.
Rev Neurol ; 63(10): 447-454, 2016 Nov 16.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27819402

RESUMO

AIM: A descriptive study of non-symptomatic epilepsy (idiopathic and cryptogenic), according to age at onset, monitored at a Neuropediatric Section of regional reference over a period of three years. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A review of neuropediatric database medical records of children with non-symptomatic epilepsy supervised from Jan 1, 2008 till December 31, 2010. RESULTS: Of the 4595 children attended during the period, 605 were diagnosed with epilepsy (13.17%): 156 (25.79%) idiopathic epilepsies and 172 (28.43%) cryptogenic epilepsies. The average age at onset of the total was 4.78 years: 6.31 years in idiopathic epilepsies and 5.43 years in cryptogenic epilepsies. 26.12% of all the epilepsies began in the first year of life. Idiopathic epilepsy predominates in the startup group of 6-10 years and cryptogenic epilepsy in 3-6 years. Absence epilepsy and benign childhood epilepsy with centro-temporal spikes are the idiopathic epileptic syndromes most prevalent. CONCLUSIONS: Many differences exist among published epidemiological data on childhood epilepsy due to the difficulty of a syndromic diagnosis in children, caused by clinical and electroencephalographic variability. The absence of a universally accepted classification of epileptic syndromes makes it difficult to compare publications. All epilepsies are symptomatic as they have a cause, whether it be genetic or acquired. A useful classification would be etiological, with two groups: one large with established etiology or very likely genetic syndromes and another with no established cause. The age at onset indicates specific etiologies.


TITLE: Estudio descriptivo de las epilepsias no sintomaticas segun la edad de inicio en una unidad de neuropediatria de referencia regional.Objetivo. Estudio descriptivo de las epilepsias no sintomaticas (idiopaticas y criptogenicas), segun la edad de inicio, controladas en una unidad de neuropediatria de referencia regional durante tres años. Pacientes y metodos. Revision de historias de niños con epilepsia no sintomatica de la base de datos de neuropediatria controlados del 1 de enero de 2008 al 31 de diciembre de 2010. Resultados. De 4.595 niños atendidos en el periodo, se diagnosticaron de epilepsia 605 (13,17%), de las cuales 156 (25,79%) fueron idiopaticas, y 172 (28,43%), criptogenicas. La edad media de inicio del total fue de 4,78 años; 6,31 años en las idiopaticas y 5,43 años en las criptogenicas. El 26,12% del total de epilepsias se inicio en el primer año. Las epilepsias idiopaticas predominan en el grupo de inicio de 6-10 años, y las criptogenicas, en el de 3-6 años. La epilepsia de ausencias y la epilepsia benigna de la infancia con paroxismos centrotemporales son los sindromes epilepticos idiopaticos mas prevalentes. Conclusiones. Existen muchas diferencias de datos epidemiologicos publicados sobre epilepsia infantil por la dificultad que entraña un diagnostico sindromico en la edad pediatrica, debido a la variabilidad clinica y electroencefalografica. La ausencia de una clasificacion universalmente aceptada de los sindromes epilepticos dificulta comparaciones entre series. Todas las epilepsias son sintomaticas, puesto que tienen causa, sea genetica o adquirida. Una clasificacion util es la etiologica, con dos grupos: un gran grupo con las etiologias establecidas o sindromes geneticos muy probables y otro de casos sin causa establecida. La edad de inicio orienta a determinadas etiologias.


Assuntos
Idade de Início , Epilepsia Tipo Ausência/epidemiologia , Epilepsia Rolândica/epidemiologia , Epilepsia/epidemiologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Eletroencefalografia , Humanos , Síndrome
18.
Rev. esp. pediatr. (Ed. impr.) ; 71(6): 363-368, nov.-dic. 2015. tab
Artigo em Espanhol | IBECS | ID: ibc-148702

RESUMO

El presente documento expone un resumen de la actual sistemática de trabajo de las Unidades dc Neuropediatría y Metabolismo del Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet de Zaragoza. Se dispone de herramientas de trabajo de enorme utilidad: bases de datos de neuropediatría y metabolismo, protocolos, hojas de información y consentimientos informados. A partir de dichas herramientas, se expone la actividad de las Unidades asistenciales, docentes y de investigación, incluida la actividad generada por el cribado neonatal ampliado (AU)


This document represents a summary of how the Neutopediatric and Metabolic Units work at the University Hospital Miguel Servet in Zaragoza. The extremely useful tools available today are Neuropediatric and Metabolic Data Bases, clinical protocols, parents’ and professionals’ information sheets and informed consent forms. Health-care, educational and research activity, including amplified neonatal screening, are drawn from these tools (AU)


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Criança , Pediatria/educação , Pediatria/métodos , Metabolismo/genética , Cuidado do Lactente/organização & administração , Ensino/classificação , Ensino/organização & administração , Protocolos Clínicos/classificação , Consentimento dos Pais/ética , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Pediatria/classificação , Pediatria , Metabolismo/fisiologia , Cuidado do Lactente/história , Ensino/história , Ensino , Bases de Dados Estatísticos , Protocolos Clínicos/normas , Consentimento dos Pais/história , Atenção Primária à Saúde/métodos
19.
Acta pediatr. esp ; 73(6): 152-158, jun. 2015. tab
Artigo em Espanhol | IBECS | ID: ibc-139585

RESUMO

Introducción: España es el primer país de Europa en número de adopciones internacionales. Los niños adoptados podrían tener mayor riesgo de presentar una patología neurológica. Objetivo: Describir la serie de pacientes adoptados atendidos en la consulta de neuropediatría durante un periodo de 22 años, determinar las patologías neurológicas más prevalentes y analizar los posibles factores de riesgo. Pacientes y métodos: Niños adoptados atendidos desde mayo de 1990 hasta mayo de 2012 (n= 226), divididos en dos grupos: adoptados nacionales (AN= 59) y adoptados internacionales (AI= 167). El grupo AI fue subdividido en cuatro áreas de procedencia: Europa del Este (AI-E), Latinoamérica (AI-L), países orientales (AI-O) e India (AI-I). Resultados: Se desconoce la mayoría de antecedentes previos a la adopción, entre los cuales los más frecuentes son el consumo materno de alcohol durante la gestación (9,3%), los malos tratos (3,5%) y el abandono (3,5%). La edad media de adopción en AI (2,71 años) fue significativamente mayor que en AN, sin diferencias en la edad media de la primera visita. Fueron remitidos desde atención primaria el 51,3% de los casos. Los motivos de consulta principales fueron el retraso psicomotor (20,8%) y los problemas escolares (12,4%). Las patologías neurológicas más prevalentes fueron los problemas de atención (30,5%, significativamente más frecuentes en los grupos AI y AI-E), la discapacidad intelectual (18,6%) y el retraso psicomotor (7,5%). El síndrome alcohólico fetal (18,1%) es prácticamente exclusivo del subgrupo AI-E. Discusión: El país de origen puede influir en el tipo de patología neurológica de los niños adoptados. Ciertos factores, como la edad de adopción, los antecedentes familiares o la estancia en orfanatos, marcan las posibilidades de desarrollo del niño (AU)


Introduction: Spain is the first country in Europe by number of international adoptions. Adopted children may be at increased risk for neurological disease. Objective: Describe the number of patients seen in consultation adopted neuropediatric for a period of 22 years, to determine the most prevalent neurological pathologies and analyze potential risk factors. Patients and methods: Children with a history of adoption attended May-1990 to May-2012 (n= 226) divided into two groups: national adopted (AN= 59) and international (AI= 167). The AI group was subdivided into four areas of origin: Eastern Europe (AI-E), Latin America (AI-L), Eastern Countries (AI-O) and India (AI-I). Results: Most pre-adoption history is unknown, the most frequent alcohol consumption during pregnancy (9.3%), abuse (3.5%) and neglect (3.5%). The average age of adoption AI (2.71 years) was significantly higher than in AN, finding no differences in mean age at first visit. Were referred from primary care 51.3%. The main reasons for visiting were psychomotor retardation (20.8%) and school problems (12.4%). The most prevalent neurological disorders were attention problems (30.5%, significantly more frequent in AI and AI-E), intellectual disability (18.6%) and psychomotor retardation (7.5%). The fetal alcohol syndrome (18.1%) is almost unique subgroup AI-E. Discussion: The country of origin may influence the type of neurological pathology of adopted children. Factors such as age of adoption, family history or stay in orphanages mark the child’s developmental possibilities (AU)


Assuntos
Criança , Humanos , Adoção , Doenças do Sistema Nervoso Central/epidemiologia , Deficiências do Desenvolvimento/epidemiologia , Hospitais Pediátricos/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores de Risco , Transtornos Psicomotores/epidemiologia
20.
Neurología (Barc., Ed. impr.) ; 29(7): 402-407, sept. 2014. tab
Artigo em Espanhol | IBECS | ID: ibc-127361

RESUMO

Introducción: El retraso global del desarrollo (RGD) y la discapacidad intelectual (DI) son motivos de consulta frecuentes en la práctica neuropediátrica. El rendimiento de los estudios diagnósticos en niños con RGD/DI varía ampliamente y, en consecuencia, no hay acuerdo universal respecto a los estudios que se deben realizar. Material y método: Revisamos nuestra experiencia en el diagnóstico etiológico de los niños con RGD/DI valorados en la consulta de Neuropediatría durante un periodo de 5 años: 2006-2010. Resultados: Durante el periodo de estudio fueron valorados 995 niños con RGD/DI. El diagnóstico etiológico fue establecido en 309 (31%) y no en 686 (69%), a pesar de múltiples estudios realizados. En 142 niños, el 46% de los casos con diagnóstico etiológico establecido, la causa es genética: 118 encefalopatías genéticas y 24 enfermedades metabólicas hereditarias. Nuestros datos indican que establecer un diagnóstico etiológico es más fácil cuando el RGD/DI está asociado a parálisis cerebral infantil, epilepsia, espasmos infantiles/síndrome de West o déficit visual, pero más difícil en casos de trastorno del espectro autista. Los estudios genéticos están incrementando los diagnósticos etiológicos y constituyéndose en el primer escalón de estudio. El microarray comparative genomic hybridisation es la prueba con mayor rentabilidad diagnóstica en el estudio de RGD/DI. Discusión: El coste-efectividad de los exámenes complementarios es aparentemente bajo en ausencia de orientación clínica. Incluso en ausencia de tratamiento, el diagnóstico etiológico es importante para establecer un consejo genético y posible diagnóstico prenatal, resolver cuestiones a padres y profesionales, y cesar la realización de más pruebas complementarias


Introduction: Global developmental delay (GDD) and intellectual disability (ID) are common reasons for consultation in paediatric neurology. Results from aetiological evaluations of children with GDD/ID vary greatly, and consequently, there is no universal consensus regarding which studies should be performed. Material and method: We review our experience with determining aetiological diagnoses for children with GDD/ID who were monitored by the paediatric neurology unit over the 5-year period between 2006 and 2010. Results: During the study period, 995 children with GDD/ID were monitored. An aetiological diagnosis was established for 309 patients (31%), but not in 686 (69%), despite completing numerous tests. A genetic cause was identified in 142 cases (46% of the total aetiologies established), broken down as 118 cases of genetic encephalopathy and 24 of metabolic hereditary diseases. Our data seem to indicate that diagnosis is easier when GDD/ID is associated with cerebral palsy, epilepsy, infantile spasms/West syndrome, or visual deficit, but more difficult in cases of autism spectrum disorders. Genetic studies provide an increasing number of aetiological diagnoses, and they are also becoming the first step in diagnostic studies. Array CGH (microarray-based comparative genomic hybridisation) is the genetic test with the highest diagnostic yield in children with unexplained GDD/ID. Discussion: The cost-effectiveness of complementary studies seems to be low if there are no clinically suspected entities. However, even in the absence of treatment, aetiological diagnosis is always important in order to provide genetic counselling and possible prenatal diagnosis, resolve family (and doctors') queries, and halt further diagnostic studies


Assuntos
Humanos , Transtornos Globais do Desenvolvimento Infantil/etiologia , Deficiência Intelectual/diagnóstico , Transtornos Psicomotores/diagnóstico , Hibridização Genômica Comparativa/métodos , Marcadores Genéticos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...